🌕 Moon Base or Martian City? A Reality Check on Musk’s Space Ambitions

The long-running debate about humanity’s first off-world settlement has resurfaced: should we establish a permanent presence on the Moon, or leap directly toward Mars?

For years, Elon Musk publicly dismissed lunar missions as a diversion from the bigger goal — colonizing Mars. His stance was clear: skip the intermediate step and head straight for the Red Planet.

But recently, Musk signaled a shift in thinking. He suggested that building a self-sustaining settlement on the Moon might be achievable within a decade, while a comparable effort on Mars could require more than twenty years.

That raises an important question: how realistic are either of these timelines?

In his new book Becoming Martian, Rice University biologist Scott Solomon explores what long-term human life beyond Earth might truly entail. After consulting researchers, visiting laboratories, and reviewing decades of scientific work, he reached a sobering conclusion: our understanding of how humans would adapt to permanent life on another world remains incomplete.

Space agencies have studied short-term missions extensively. Humans have traveled to space for more than six decades, and researchers have gathered substantial data about the immediate physiological impacts of microgravity and space exposure.

However, sustained multi-year habitation on the Moon or Mars presents a different challenge altogether.

One of the greatest threats to long-term settlement is cosmic radiation. Earth’s magnetic field shields us from much of this exposure, but neither the Moon nor Mars provides equivalent protection.

A landmark NASA study examined the effects of nearly a year spent aboard the International Space Station. Even in low Earth orbit — where some shielding exists — astronauts experienced measurable biological changes, including genetic alterations.

Life on the surface of the Moon or Mars would expose settlers to even higher radiation levels.

Possible solutions include:

While underground living is technically feasible — history offers examples of ancient subterranean cities — the psychological and lifestyle trade-offs could be significant.

Permanent residents may find themselves spending much of their lives below the surface, limiting outdoor exploration.

Extended isolation, confinement, and reduced gravity environments present both physical and mental challenges. Muscle degradation, bone density loss, and stress responses are well-documented in long-duration missions.

Scaling those conditions from months to decades introduces variables that scientists are still trying to understand.

The reality is that creating a thriving community off Earth involves far more than rockets and construction plans — it requires deep biological and environmental adaptation.

Another concept often discussed is terraforming — altering Mars to resemble Earth more closely. Theoretically, this could involve warming the planet and thickening its atmosphere.

But according to Solomon’s analysis, such an effort would demand enormous technological advances and ongoing maintenance. Even optimistic scenarios describe it as a monumental, long-term undertaking rather than a near-term solution.

Musk’s revised timeline places a lunar city within reach in under a decade and a Martian settlement two decades away. While engineering progress continues rapidly, biological and environmental realities may prove to be the slower-moving constraints.

Establishing human life beyond Earth is not just an engineering challenge — it is a test of physiology, psychology, and planetary science.

The dream of building cities beyond our planet remains one of humanity’s most ambitious goals. Whether the first permanent foothold is on the Moon or Mars, the journey will demand far more than technological speed.

The bigger question may not be how fast we can get there — but how well we can live once we arrive.

Stay updated with the latest insights—subscribe to our newsletter for real-time market analysis!